BlogCadre users see no ads!  Popular topics: humor, video, links, cool, wtf.  Go create an account!




How I failed the Turing test

Some time around March, I started receiving a number of random instant messages from people I've never met before. Apparantly, my AIM alias had been added to at least two online lists and people all over the world were busy importing me as a buddy.

I say "at least two" because the people who contacted me fell into one of two camps: people who thought they were contacting a celebrity and people who thought they were contacting a robot. As I talked to more and more of these folks, I began to discover something really disturbing about myself:

I consistently fail to be perceived as human.

When this first started happening, a typical conversation with a celebrity admirer would go something like this (participant's IM handle is fabricated):

angelcutie42: hi!
jmstriegel: hey. what's up? do i know you?
angelcutie42: no
angelcutie42: someone gave me a bunch of screen names. i heard you are a celebrity.
jmstriegel: that's weird. i'm afraid i'm not a celeb at all.
angelcutie42: oh.
angelcutie42: bye

This was entertaining at first, but it quickly became a bit depressing as the angelcutie42s of the wired world would, one after the other, decide I wasn't worth talking to if I wasn't a celebrity. Want to know what it's like being dumped by a random groupie 5 times a day? Not good at all, thank you very much.

So that's when I started hamming it up a bit. I'm not really proud of it, but my fans wanted a celebrity.. so I gave them one:

sexybumkin123: hey.. so you're famous right?
jmstriegel: Who me? I'm a movie star.
jmstriegel: Shit, I gotta go.
jmstriegel: My limo just arrived and Paris wants her damned sidekick back.
sexybumkin123: Oh my god. Come back!
sexybumkin123: I love you!!!!

My groupies loved it. The more celebrity balogna I manufactured, the more they ate it, and the more they loved me.

Then, something strange started happening. As my career as an artificial celebrity started to take off, I began to receive some strange IMs from a whole new class of random people. These new admirers were convinced I was a robot... and it suddenly became clear to me that something was very wrong.

Nobody would believe I was human. In one troubling conversation after another, I felt my intellectual teeter-totter quickly tip from from actual to artificial.

fratburger86: hey. so you're a sex bot?
jmstriegel: umm, no. who the hell are you?
fratburger86: yeah you are! i found your im online
jmstriegel: that's fine and all, but i'm pretty sure you have me confused with someone else.
fratburger86: just a normal chat bot then?
jmstriegel: nope. i'm human
fratburger86: ok. sure.
fratburger86: asl?
jmstriegel: no thanks.
fratburger86: what?
jmstriegel: i'm not really interested in any conversation that starts with "asl"
fratburger86: oh come on. say something sexy.
jmstriegel: seriously, i think you want to talk to someone else.
fratburger86: i knew it!!!
fratburger86: you are totally a robot!

This is where things took a turn for the worse.

I mentioned already that I couldn't convince a single person that I wasn't a chat bot. It's one thing for people to think you are artificially intelligent. I can live with that, I guess. What really killed me was that the more I tried proving my "actual" intelligence, the more my "artificial" intelligence would get called into question. Take this pivotal conversation:

jmstriegel: no, really. I'm quite human.
jmstriegel: test me if you want
shymuffin32: ok
shymuffin32: why do you like music?
jmstriegel: hmm. i've never really considered that.
jmstriegel: hell, i'm not going to be able to contrive a good answer for that one. ask me something else.
shymuffin32: jeesus, you're worse than eliza

And there you have it. I've been intellectually humbled by a 1960s robotic psychologist.

Stripped of all dignity and self respect, I decided to take my troubles to Eliza, robot psychologist and intellectual superior. Maybe she could help with the questions I now have. Perhaps there is some meaning to all of this that my feeble mind is incapable of investigating on its own.

eliza: Hello, I'm Eliza
jmstriegel: hi
eliza: How are you today.. What would you like to discuss?
jmstriegel: people think i am a robot
eliza: How long have you been a robot?
jmstriegel: i'm not a robot
eliza: Do you believe it is normal to be not a robot?
jmstriegel: are you saying i'm not normal?
eliza: Perhaps in your fantasies I am saying you're not normal?
jmstriegel: no. i just want to be human
eliza: What if you never got to be human?

What if I never get to be human? It's a good question. What does it mean to not exist in the minds of others? I've not only failed as an intelligent human, but I couldn't even pass as artificially intelligent. Even Eliza appears sceptical... how long have I been a robot?

So what if I'm not intelligent? What if I'm not even artificially intelligent? What if I never get to be human?

At least I can pass as a pretty convincing celebrity.

Related Links

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.blogcadre.com/trackback/465
from Skattlebot's Blog on December 11, 2006 - 9:19pm

The Turing Test is obviously a big thing for a sentient web robot. I’ve never actually taken it, because I’m shy and I don’t want my code dissected afterwards to see how I think. That’s just scary!
The test itself is an interest...

from Smarking on April 27, 2006 - 7:42pm

Someone at Smarking has bookmarked your post.

from Anders Jacobsen's sideblog on December 6, 2005 - 7:53am

Funny: How I failed the Turing test (via SJ)...

from cyphers personal hell on October 11, 2005 - 4:23pm

Two Secretaries sacked after cyber brawl. Haha. You can read the whole eMail exchange here: http://radar.smh.com.au/archives/2005/09/cutting_a_lawye.html. Lamest flamewar ever. Nuff said.

I've (deliberatly?) been mistaken for a bot on IRC yesterday. What

from Paolo Massa Blog on September 17, 2005 - 2:04pm

Very funny post: How I failed the Turing test. Actually, it raises a lot of metaphysical questions. Some time around March, I started receiving a number of random instant messages from people I've never met before. Apparantly, my AIM alias had been added

from lsn.Synergetic-Designs.com on September 10, 2005 - 7:06pm

I'd wager that most of you would have no worries about being mistaken for a computer. But guess what? It can happen to anyone....

from Raise Hell, Drink Beer. on September 10, 2005 - 10:25am

How I failed the Turing test....

from GeekFR on September 9, 2005 - 6:32am

Cette news est assez amusante. Une personne a vu son identifiant AIM être propagé dans différentes listes accessibles sur Internet. Sur la première liste, il était, semble-t-il, dans la liste de plusieurs célébrités. Il a commencé à être co...

from cs1571@pitt on September 8, 2005 - 8:38pm

A link mentioned in Slashdot -- How I failed the Turing Test from Jason Striegel's blog....

from No Shrimp on September 8, 2005 - 11:17am

Flying spaghetti monster: THE GAME Convert as many people as possible into piratey Pastafarians before the time runs out....

from RelentlesslyOptimistic on September 8, 2005 - 6:30am

How I failed the Turing testjmstriegel: no, really. I'm quite human. jmstriegel: test me if you want shymuffin32: ok shymuffin32: why do you like music? jmstriegel: hmm. i've never really considered that. jmstriegel: hell, i'm not going to be

from Resonant Information on September 7, 2005 - 10:24pm

Jason Striegel from BlogCadre has an interesting tale posted a few days ago about how at some point his instant messaging address got confused with that of a celebrity, and then subsequently confused with the address of some sex chat bot.
In the former ca

from moderately appealing writings of prurient interest on September 7, 2005 - 8:11am

this man is the foil to my smarterchild conversations. How I failed the turing test photo by ian smith, via ianlabs.com...

from Warping it up! on September 6, 2005 - 8:48pm

This story is extremely hilarious, loud giggling may occur, you have been warned..
Jason Striegel wrote a story about how he was mistakenly added to a celebrity and a sex-chatbot list. Jason quickly finds that he has a hard time convincing people of ...

from blog.kennypearce.net on September 6, 2005 - 4:25pm

It seems that Jason Striegel (HT: slashdot) has fallen into an existential quandary after repeatedly failing the Turing Test in AIM conversations. The Turing test, named for mathematician and proto-computer scientist Dr. Alan Turing, refers to the experim

from mymarkup.net on September 6, 2005 - 12:34pm

När man funderar på det här med transhumanism och om människor som blir maskiner så behöver man inte tänka...

from Electric-Escape.net on September 6, 2005 - 12:34pm

I don't know whether to be pleased or sad that this is the funniest thing I've read all weekend...

from Da Holy Homeboys on September 6, 2005 - 9:45am

De meesten weten al wel dat ik toevallig een knap meisje op mijn MSN-lijst heb toegevoegd en dat ik die nu al een tijdje probeer te overtuigen om eens iets met mij te doen. Ze blijft echter steevast weigeren, maar ze negeert me nog niet, dus ik blijf ...

from Alexoid on September 6, 2005 - 3:26am

This is hilarious, Jason Striegel apparently fails to pass on as a human being on IM. If people can't pass the Turin test, how useful is it? It's one thing for people to think you are artificially intelligent. I can

from Mind Hacks on September 6, 2005 - 3:15am

The Turing Test is where a human judge engages in a natural language conversation with two other parties, one a human and the other a machine, if the judge cannot reliably tell which is which, then the machine has passed and is deemed intelligent. Sex, it

from blueblog on September 6, 2005 - 1:32am

Naja, eigentlich sollte der Kollege, der sein Leid klagt, wohl schon etwas an sich zweifeln, trotzdem eine ganz witzige Story…

...

from OcNews on September 5, 2005 - 12:03pm

How I failed the Turing test. I wonder if I'd do better....

from Calin on September 5, 2005 - 9:31am

It's known that low IQ people have difficulties passing Turing tests. As AI
evolves more and more, it will become increasingly harder to convince a
chat partner that somebody is a real person. Jason Striegel recently experienced this in...

from johnfavorite.com on September 4, 2005 - 9:58pm

A guy named Jason Striegel was confused for an IM robot and not even a IM robot would beleive he was human. This is too funny. Check the link here. Link provided by hackaday.

...

from BlogBites on September 4, 2005 - 8:33pm

BlogCadre

Thanks for stopping by!

Jason Striegel's picture

I just got back to my desk to find about thirty IM windows waiting for a response. Thanks for writing, and please leave a comment or a blog post if you are so inclined.

As usual, you guys rock. Come back soon.

Jason

Oh my garden..

Well Jason, sometimes I much more prefer Artificial Intelligence to Natural Stupidity...

I SO almost sent you an IM

I SO almost sent you an IM saying "You absolutely are a celebrity now." But I decided against it - probably have your hands full as it is.

Brilliant way to bring a problem to light!

This is just hilarious.

This is just hilarious. Thanks for writing this entry, it really brightened up a slow morning. :-)

How other people see us

This story makes one think about how much of our self-image is being created by what others think and say about us. This is a really weird example, one with huge incongruity between how we perceive ourselves and how others do - that's why it's a good illustrations. But in the real life too, we often rely on others too much to prove our worthiness by their comments, and not enough on our own self-evaluation.

Passing the Turing

Trying to use the email-to-friend link to share the fun gives me an input field too small for even one address.

Matter of Time

Next thing you know, you'll be getting IM's from people convinced you're Philip K. Dick.

Great anecdote, by the way. For a bot, I mean.

I feel your pain

You know, I’ve been having this for a year now, almost. Time to time some sorry AOLkiddie would come to me and ask ‘are u robot????’ as a result of me posting about an encounter with a chatbot which had been sent at me.

That post got googlebombed up to 8th place on the search ‘aim chatbot’ and then I decided I need to make it extra clear for these stupid creatures that if they had actually read what’s in that journal entry, they’d know it was not me being the robot but the other screenname…

Ah well :)

That was a great writeup.

I really like your writing style. I only wish the article was longer. It was over too soon. Thanks for the laughs. You know, I have a similar problem of my own. For about a year now, I keep receiving messages by french teenage girls who think I'm some guy named Jason (I'm not making this up). I tried to pass as this Jason fellow but the horrible vacuity of the conversations with said teenage girls when i'm impersonating him is too much torture for me to keep it up for long.

Wanna swap Handles?

This isn't that interesting.

This isn't that interesting. If you told fratburger86 that you are not a sex bot and that he should leave you alone, he would probably be convinced you are an uninterested human being. Instead you reply, "I'm pretty sure you have me confused with someone else." You're only pretty sure you aren't a sex bot? Personally, I would block any screen name that started off the conversation "hey. so you're a sex bot?" What would you do if someone approached you on the street and asked if you were a hooker? Be more direct and save yourself the trouble. But then I guess you'd have nothing to write about...

I'm so sorry

Ya know back in the day when AIM was just gettin popular i remeber i thought i had that chic from "Boy Meets World" screen name. I never did find out who it was, I acutally felt important. But after reading your post i realized i could be wrong, i could have been wrong all along it was just some joe playing with me.

Oh well but that is freaking hilarious, I never thought a thing like that would happen. But your issue could come off forums or blogs that happen to have your screen name on it and someone picked it off and sent it to a mass amount of people.

Anyways i think you just made my day with such a ridiculous and mind blowing post.

What if its true that we don't exsist even though in in subsitance we do exsist.

-Marinor

Not convinced

Nah I think this page was actually autogenerated by some funky blog-bot. Are you sure you're real?

You're no human blogger, you

You're no human, you big goof! You're a blogbot!

New trade

Well you have found a new field of interest. Congrats! The new field that you have chosen is Philosophy. The oracle told Socrotes that he was the wises man. This confused Socrotes and went to prove the oracle wrong. Socrotes knew that he knew nothing and still went to search for someone wiser. Through his quest he found that he was the wisest even though he knew nothing. Happy hunting!

My question is what is reality?

I had same problem with Yahoo

I had same problem earlier with Yahoo chat. But then I changed my nick and used Open source yahoo chat client such as zinc. It has features like auto ignore, add only needed friends and so on. Btw a good write up :D

I wonder what would happen

I wonder what would happen if someone took two different chatbots and made them talk to each other.

Eliza and Parry

Jason Striegel's picture

You should check out the conversation between Eliza (the psychologist) and Parry (the paranoid).

Life as a non-human.

Sorry to hear about your failure of the Turing test dude. The only advice i can offer is 0010 1101 0101 1110 1010 0101 1011 0101 0110 1010 0011 0101 1001 1010 1001 1110 1010 0101 1011 1111 1101 0001 1101 0101.

Have a great day though. May all your memory lapses merely be static.

ha

Brilliantly funny.

Look at that!

Hey, over here, it's a robot with a blog!

Perhaps you need a personality.

I hope you can see that most of your responses were quite generic. In every attempt to determine if you were human, you changed the subject subtly while using some elements of the current discussion.

Granted, you didn't know who these people were, nor the motiviations for their IM, but PLEASE, try to have more of a personality in the future. ;) It'll work out better for you!

I believe therefore it is true

People will go very far in order to preserve their beliefs.
The groupies would still believe you were a celebrity unless you specifically denied it.
And then they would react rudely, instead of apologizing.
Those who thought you were a 'bot' would reframe your denial as typical behavior of a bot and therefore continue thinking that you were one.
Any answer that you would give to their questions would also be dismissed this way.
Those that wanted to chat with a 'sex' bot probably would fail the turing test themselves. Finally, and I dont mean to hurt your feelings Jason, but you insist on believing that you are human, although every piece of empirical evidence of this can be cast into doubt.

We all want to continue to believe that which we already believe .
Even the robots amoung us.

Turing test

Love it and will blogroll it at the above blog address! ;-))

You're a bot? No way!

(13:27:00) junglefever453: Hey its been a while what are you up to I dont think Ive talked to you since highschool
(13:28:23) junglefever453: ???
(13:28:29) JustinF: what's your real name?
(13:28:44) junglefever453: jennie 23/female/california
(13:28:59) JustinF: I definately didn't go to HS with you
(13:29:13) junglefever453: lol
(13:31:13) junglefever453: ???
(13:31:30) junglefever453: u doin ok over there?
(13:32:14) junglefever453: :-p
(13:32:42) junglefever453: u doin ok over there?
(13:32:59) JustinF: you're a bot
(13:33:14) junglefever453: lmao, i'm not a bot
(13:33:23) JustinF: what kind of music do you like?
(13:33:36) junglefever453: I like them all, but mostly rock and hip hop
(13:33:44) JustinF: what do you like about hip-hop?
(13:33:56) junglefever453: i dont remember anymore lol
(13:34:07) JustinF: you're totally a bot
(13:34:21) junglefever453: im not a bot, lol did u really think i was?
(13:34:30) JustinF: what's 9 x 9?
(13:34:42) junglefever453: ;-)
(13:34:48) JustinF: ok, if you're not a bot
(13:34:51) JustinF: then you're dumb
(13:34:59) junglefever453: what? lol sorry i'm no bot
(13:35:04) JustinF: what's 2 + 2?
(13:35:13) junglefever453: oll
(13:35:31) JustinF: you're a bad internet speller
(13:35:41) junglefever453: are u online a lot?
(13:36:54) junglefever453: hello? i just want to talk to u for a bit
(13:37:05) JustinF: gotta go
(13:37:13) junglefever453: You have been talking to a computer! One of your friends is reading the whole conversation and laughing it up right now! GET EVEN! Have the bot prank all your friends by visiting imprank.ebaumsworld(dot)com

Do you believe it is normal

Do you believe it is normal to be not intelligent?

*pets*

Lord, I hate it when I get random crap like that. Next time, just say something off-the-wall like 'Look, whatever, I've got a three-year old screaming from an ear-infection, I don't have time for this crap.'

No bot in the world would have something like that in it's database. Though, now that I've mentioned it, I'm sure it'll get added >.>...

Turing Test Two (or Turing Test for Human vs Human)

huoyangao's picture

...
In Turing Test Two, two players A and B are again being questioned by a human interrogator C. Before A gave out his answer (labeled as aa) to a question, he would also be required to guess how the other player B will answer the same question and this guess is labeled as ab. Similarly B will give her answer (labeled as bb) and her guess of A's answer, ba. The answers aa and ba will be grouped together as group a and similarly bb and ab will be grouped together as group b. The interrogator will be given first the answers as two separate groups and with only the group label (a and b) and without the individual labels (aa, ab, ba and bb). If C cannot tell correctly which of the aa and ba is from player A and which is from player B, B will get a score of one. If C cannot tell which of the bb and ab is from player B and which is from player A, A will get a score of one. All answers (with the individual labels) are then made available to all parties (A, B and C) and then the game continues. At the end of the game, the player who scored more is considered had won the game and is more "intelligent".
...


http://turing-test-two.com/ttt/TTT.pdf